Whats up everyone. I am scripting this to warn the group concerning the arbitrary and non-transparent course of behind the Binance "Collectively Initiative" compensation.

This isn't simply me complaining about "goodwill" cash. That is a few compensation program for the Oct 10-11 "abnormal ADL" failure (which Wintermute's CEO alleged), where Binance is publicly refusing to elucidate its own standards.

• My Loss Ratio: **126%** (Max Severity - $24okay loss / $19okay belongings).
• The Program Vary: $4 to $6,000.
• My Payout: **$4,000**.
• My Question: Why did my 126% loss not qualify for the $6,000 Max Payout?
• Binance's Answer (after 5+ hours & Escalations Group): **They ADMITTED they use secret formulation and REFUSED to offer any details.**

The Full Story & Proof

I am one of many victims of the Oct 10-11 liquidations. My 126% loss ratio proves I was one of the severely impacted.

Once I acquired only $4,000 (from a $4-$6,000 range), I contacted help (Case 149802630).

Part 1: The First Admissions (Case 149802630)

After hours of arguing, the agent (Gabriela) admitted my 126% calculation was right, however that my payout was low because of secret elements.

• Admission #1 (The Secret Elements): They admitted to using "inner assessment incorporates multiple knowledge points and danger elements *past* just the web asset worth". (The general public standards was Loss / Internet Belongings).
• Admission #2 (The Smoking Gun): Once I asked for the method, they officially said: "Pricey Consumer, we don't present mathematical calculation on this. I can't inform you on the formulation used."

Half 2: The 5-Hour Escalation Battle (Case CC8142784)

I used to be informed my first attraction was rejected (for an irrelevant "system error" purpose). I started a new 5+ hour chat that went all the best way to the "Escalations Staff" (Tavares).

His job was to silence me. For hours, he simply repeated "our choice is remaining."

• He refused to answer why 126% loss gets the same as 30% loss.
• He refused to elucidate the standards for the $6,000 most payout.
• His ultimate protection was accountable me: "We are sorry that you simply interpreted our answers that method."

Part three: The Public X (Twitter) Battle & Silence

After being stonewalled internally, I took this public to X (Twitter). 1. I posted all the proof (126% vs $4k, "components refused"). 2. After 24 hours of strain, u/BinanceHelpDesk replied PUBLICLY. 3. Their official reply was **NOT** to help, however to dismiss me again: "our staff explained to you concerning the remaining determination... We aren't capable of proceed further." Four. I replied one final time, proving their "rationalization" was a "REFUSAL." 5. Their remaining response? Complete silence. They might not answer, in order that they ran.`

Conclusion

Binance is operating a compensation program with a public $Four-$6,000 vary, but they have **formally admitted (and confirmed on Twitter) that the *precise* formulation is secret, inner, and will not be offered.**

This is not transparency. This isn't "rebuilding confidence." It's an arbitrary "black field."

Here is the gallery of all the proof (my emails, and the key chat/Twitter screenshots): https://imgur.com/a/CILBey2

Watch out, everybody. Their "goodwill" isn't as truthful as it appears.