My algo has a 1.70 Sharpe after 84 days live — but 0 copiers. Sharing the full equity curve so someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong

I've been quietly operating a spot algo on Binance since early March — real money, no paper trading — and after 84 days I'm making an attempt to know why I've zero copiers regardless of metrics that I assumed would stand out. Posting the complete screenshot as a result of I genuinely need suggestions, not validation.

The strategy is a dynamic ATR grid with a circuit breaker that mechanically halts new buy orders throughout sharp drops to guard capital. Hosted on AWS Tokyo for latency causes.

90-day stay results:
– ROI: +16.39% (PnL: +$84.83)
– Sharpe Ratio: 1.70
– Max Drawdown: 13.11%
– Win Price: 79.52% — 66 of 84 days green

The factor I find most fascinating in that fairness curve is the March–April interval. You'll be able to see the drawdown line spike when the market dropped, then the bot paused buys, and it recovered to new highs by late Might without any guide intervention. The circuit breaker did precisely what it was designed to do.

For context: a Sharpe of 1.zero is extensively thought-about "good" for an lively technique. Most retail algo traders I see posting listed here are proud of zero.7–zero.9 on backtests. This is 1.70 on a stay account with real slippage and costs.

And but — Binance's copy trading algorithm buries me because my lead stability is ~$618. Traders with $50okay–$100okay and visibly worse drawdowns are featured above me.

Two things I'm genuinely not sure about:
1. Is there a method to make risk-adjusted metrics more visible to potential copiers on platforms like this, or is it purely a capital signaling recreation?
2. Taking a look at my fairness curve — is there something that might make you personally hesitant to copy this, that I'm not seeing from the within?

Recognize trustworthy takes.